∑math20

Algebraic and complex geometry · Result 054

Irrational cubic fourfolds with Hodge-theoretic and categorical K3 associations

1 paper

For every sufficiently large admissible Hassett discriminant, a very general smooth complex cubic fourfold is irrational despite having both an untwisted geometric K3 category and an integral Hodge-theoretic K3 association. This disproves Kuznetsov's rationality conjecture and the sufficiency of the associated-K3 criterion for rationality; the discriminant threshold is ineffective.

Watch

1

The problem

What is being asked, where it comes from, and why it is hard. No proof needed.

▶Introduction to the problemin preparation
2

The solution proposed by OpenAI

How the paper solves it, step by step.

Full explanation
▶The proposed solutionin preparation

Papers 1

First page of Irrational cubic fourfolds with geometric K3 categories

Irrational cubic fourfolds with geometric K3 categories

OpenAI · September 24, 2026

For every sufficiently large admissible Hassett discriminant, we prove that a very general cubic fourfold of that discriminant is irrational, although its Kuznetsov component is equivalent to the ordinary derived category of a projective K3 surface. The discriminant threshold is ineffective. This disproves Kuznetsov's rationality conjecture. The same cubics have associated untwisted polarized K3 surfaces in the Hodge-theoretic sense, so they also disprove the sufficiency direction of the associated-K3 rationality prediction.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:Irrational-cubic-fourfolds-with-geometric-K3-categories-September-24-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Irrational cubic fourfolds with geometric K3 categories}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Irrational-cubic-fourfolds-with-geometric-K3-categories-September-24-2026/Irrational-cubic-fourfolds-with-geometric-K3-categories-September-24-2026.pdf}{OAI:Irrational-cubic-fourfolds-with-geometric-K3-categories-September-24-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Formal verification

No Lean formalization is listed for this result yet. The repository notes that unformalized results could have issues.