∑math20

Mathematical physics · Result 284

The optimal quartic separation between randomized and quantum queries

1 paper

Shows that the universal bound \(R(f)=O((1+Q(f))^4)\) for total Boolean functions is sharp in its exponent, ruling out every smaller power and disproving the conjectured cubic relation. Here R and Q are randomized and quantum worst-case bit-query complexities with error at most 1/3; computation between queries is unrestricted.

Watch

▶Introduction: the problem and why it mattersin preparation
▶The presented solutionin preparation

Papers 1

First page of A Nearly Quartic Separation Between Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity

A Nearly Quartic Separation Between Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity

OpenAI · October 5, 2026

We construct total Boolean functions with a nearly quartic separation between bounded-error randomized and quantum query complexity. Writing these complexities as \(\mathrm R(f)\) and \(\mathrm Q(f)\), the examples rule out every universal bound \(\mathrm R(f)=O((1+\mathrm Q(f))^\alpha)\) with α < 4. Thus the known quartic upper bound has the optimal exponent, disproving the conjectured cubic bound. Both complexities count worst-case bit queries with error at most 1/3 on every input.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:A-Nearly-Quartic-Separation-Between-Randomized-and-Quantum-Query-Complexity-October-5-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Nearly Quartic Separation Between Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Nearly-Quartic-Separation-Between-Randomized-and-Quantum-Query-Complexity-October-5-2026/quartic-query-separation.pdf}{OAI:A-Nearly-Quartic-Separation-Between-Randomized-and-Quantum-Query-Complexity-October-5-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Formal verification

No Lean formalization is listed for this result yet. The repository notes that unformalized results could have issues.